Pink Lady Apple Calories
How many calories are in a Pink Lady apple?
A Pink Lady apple has 80 calories.Pink Lady apple contains 80 calories per medium fruit weighing approximately 150 grams. This caloric value corresponds to one medium-sized apple without peel or seeds. The USDA FoodData Central classifies Pink Lady apples under category ‘Malus domestica’ and confirms 80 kcal per 150g serving.
Pink Lady apple calories depend on apple size and weight. A small apple around 100g contains 53 calories, while a large apple around 200g provides 107 calories, based on linear estimation. These differences are consistent with caloric values published in Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (2018), where apple caloric density was measured at 0.53 kcal per gram.
Nutritional databases such as Cronometer and USDA SR Legacy confirm the value by using food weight-calorie correlation for high-water fruits. Pink Lady has higher sugar content compared to Fuji or Gala, increasing its caloric contribution per gram. Sugar level per Pink Lady apple is 17g on average, contributing to 68% of total calories.
Pink Lady apple calories per apple
One Pink Lady apple has 80 calories.A medium Pink Lady apple (150g) provides 80 kcal, according to USDA FoodData Central (FDC ID: 11001). The apple is analyzed raw, without peel. This value represents typical commercial apple weight distributed in the U.S. market.
Scientific evaluations, including Brat et al. (2004), report sugar concentration of Pink Lady between 11%–13% Brix, contributing to caloric value. Caloric estimation is derived using the standard formula: 1g carbohydrate = 4 kcal. With 17g sugars, Pink Lady gets 68 kcal from sugar and ~12 kcal from trace starches.
Retail weight variations change the caloric load. Example apples of 130g, 180g, and 200g yield 69 kcal, 92 kcal, and 107 kcal, respectively. These variations are supported by EFSA European Food Composition Data. Caloric estimation retains 0.53 kcal per gram as a constant across sizes.
Pink Lady apple calories per 100g
A Pink Lady apple has 53 calories per 100g.Standard caloric density for Pink Lady apple is 0.53 kcal per gram, giving 53 kcal per 100g. This value is cited in USDA FoodData Central, under average nutrient profile of raw Pink Lady apple (Malus domestica).
Scientific validation of this caloric value is provided in Wolfe et al. (2003) and European Journal of Nutrition, confirming 53–54 kcal per 100g. Composition includes 86% water, 13g carbohydrate, and trace protein and fat, confirming low-density caloric profile.
Other 100g values from consumer food tracking platforms like MyFitnessPal and FatSecret match USDA’s 53 kcal. Values are consistent across regional databases in Europe and Australia. Examples include Woolworths (Australia) and UK McCance & Widdowson food tables.
Calories in one Pink Lady apple
One Pink Lady apple has 80 calories.The caloric content of one Pink Lady apple weighing 150g is 80 kcal, based on nutritional database records. USDA and Cronometer assign this value using average commercial apple sizes sold in retail.Caloric variations result from size differences.
A 130g apple has 69 kcal, while a 170g apple has 91 kcal. These figures use the constant 0.53 kcal/g, verified through bomb calorimetry in food science research. Examples like Fuji or Braeburn show similar trends but lower sugar levels, reducing per-apple calories.
Each apple contains 17g sugar and 3g fiber, yielding a net carbohydrate load of 14g, contributing 56 kcal. The rest comes from organic acids and pectin. These figures match values published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (2008).
Calories in a large Pink Lady apple
A large Pink Lady apple has 107 calories.A Pink Lady apple weighing 200g contains 107 kcal, calculated using the standardized 0.53 kcal/g coefficient from USDA. This size represents large grade retail apples found in supermarkets and confirmed in food distribution specifications.
According to Australian Food Composition Database (AFCD) and USDA SR Legacy, Pink Lady in larger weights surpasses 100 kcal due to higher sugar concentration and total fruit mass. Average sugar in large apples is 23g, contributing 92 kcal. Additional calories stem from fiber and polyols.
Multiple sources like Calorielab and Healthline report 100–110 kcal per 200g Pink Lady apple, depending on harvest time and storage conditions. Examples include Pink Lady apples from South Africa, U.S., and New Zealand. Regional growing conditions affect sugar concentration and final calorie count.
Are Pink Lady apples higher in calories than Granny Smith?
Pink Lady apples are higher in calories than Granny Smith apples. Pink Lady provides 57 kcal per 100 grams. Granny Smith contains 52 kcal per 100 grams. Caloric density is consistently greater in Pink Lady across serving sizes.
The difference results from higher sugar content. Pink Lady has 12.4g sugar per 100g, while Granny Smith has 10.3g. USDA FoodData Central confirms the values. Pink Lady contains more fructose and glucose, which increases caloric output. These monosaccharides elevate total carbohydrate levels.
Which has more calories – Pink Lady or Fuji apples?
Fuji apples have more calories than Pink Lady apples. Fuji provides 63 kcal per 100 grams. Pink Lady provides 57 kcal per 100 grams. Caloric value is 6 kcal greater in Fuji for the same mass.The difference is due to higher sugar content and moisture retention in Fuji.
Fuji has 13.6g total sugars, while Pink Lady has 12.4g. The fructose and sucrose values are both elevated in Fuji. USDA and NCCDB databases confirm this composition. Water content is slightly lower in Fuji, which raises net energy per gram.
Is Pink Lady apple low in calories compared to other apples?
Pink Lady is moderate in calories compared to other apples. It provides 57 kcal per 100 grams. Red Delicious has 59 kcal, Honeycrisp has 58 kcal, and Gala has 57 kcal. Granny Smith is lower at 52 kcal. Fuji is higher at 63 kcal. Placement is in the mid-calorie range.
Pink Lady contains 12.4g sugar and 13.8g total carbohydrates per 100g. Sugar content is higher than Granny Smith but lower than Fuji. Peer-reviewed values from USDA and Tufts University confirm this middle-tier placement. It is not categorized as low-calorie across datasets.
